The highest Proven Scores in Cloud infrastructure are Google Cloud (87/100, Proven), AWS (86/100, Proven) and Cloudflare (86/100, Proven). They are ranked on the Proven Trust Index using Proven marketplaces, Member redemption clicks, Client quality, Operating tenure, Market standing, Connected relationships and Connected data. Inputs without data are left out and the score is scaled to 100. Vendors cannot pay to change a score.
| Rank | Name | Proven Score | Band | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Google Cloud | 87 | Proven | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 2 | AWS | 86 | Proven | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 3 | Cloudflare | 86 | Proven | Team size: 5,200 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 4 | Microsoft for Startups | 84 | Proven. Provisional score | Team size: 223,000 employees · Region: Redmond, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 5 | Microsoft for Startups | 71 | Established | Team size: 223,000 employees · Region: Redmond, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 6 | Vercel | 68 | Established | Stage: Venture (Round not Specified) · Team size: 550 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 7 | Nebius AI Studio | 64 | Established | Team size: 1,600 employees · Region: Amsterdam, Netherlands · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 8 | OVHcloud | 62 | Established | Team size: 3,000 employees · Region: Roubaix, France · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 9 | IBM | 61 | Established | Team size: 264,000 employees · Region: Armonk, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 10 | Oracle | 61 | Established | Team size: 141,000 employees · Region: Austin, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 11 | Render | 59 | Established | Stage: Series C · Team size: 230 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 12 | DigitalOcean | 57 | Established | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 13 | Modal | 57 | Established | Stage: Series D · Team size: 250 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 14 | Byteplus (from Bytedance) | 56 | Established | Team size: 150 employees · Region: Singapore, Singapore · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 15 | Netlify | 53 | Established | Stage: Series D · Team size: 210 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 16 | Microsoft Azure | 49 | Emerging | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 17 | DuploCloud | 47 | Emerging | Stage: Series B · Team size: 150 employees · Region: San Jose, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 18 | Scaleway | 47 | Emerging | Team size: 670 employees · Region: Paris, France · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 19 | DoiT | 46 | Emerging | Stage: Other · Team size: 580 employees · Region: Santa Clara, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 20 | Crusoe | 46 | Emerging | Stage: Series F · Team size: 1,300 employees · Region: Denver, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 21 | CAST AI | 44 | Emerging | Stage: Series C · Team size: 380 employees · Region: Miami, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 22 | nOps | 44 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 180 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 23 | Pump.co | 40 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 110 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 24 | Vantage | 40 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 95 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 25 | ProsperOps | 40 | Emerging | Stage: Venture (Round not Specified) · Team size: 90 employees · Region: Austin, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 26 | Northflank | 35 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 25 employees · Region: London, United Kingdom · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 27 | ScaleOps | 31 | Emerging | Stage: Series C · Team size: 150 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 28 | TensorWave | 30 | Emerging | Stage: Series B · Team size: 180 employees · Region: Las Vegas, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 29 | GMI Cloud | 20 | Emerging | Stage: Debt Financing · Team size: 160 employees · Region: Mountain View, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 30 | FlexAI | 19 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 64 employees · Region: Paris, France · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 31 | SmartHost | 17 | Emerging | Team size: 4 employees · Region: Dublin, Ireland · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 32 | Hoonify | 13 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 33 | Mithril | 12 | Emerging | Team size: 41 employees · Region: Palo Alto, United States · Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 34 | io.net | 11 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 35 | Qarnot computing | 11 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 36 | Metroo | 10 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 37 | Microsoft for Startups | 9 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 38 | Antimetal | 8 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 39 | Gaib AI | 7 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 40 | Chainstack | 6 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 41 | CloudFix | 6 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 42 | CoreWeave | 6 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 43 | Crusoe Cloud (GPUs for ML) | 6 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 44 | Jade Hosting | 6 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 45 | Akamai Technologies | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 46 | Aptible | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
| 47 | Azion | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cloud infrastructure |
Vendors in Cloud infrastructure are ordered by Proven Score. Data updated 2026-10-27. Inputs without data are left out and the score is scaled to 100. A score without client quality is marked Provisional score.
| Input | How it is measured | Max |
|---|---|---|
| Proven marketplaces | Investor, bank and government marketplaces on Proven that list the vendor. Log scale, full marks at 150. | 15 |
| Profile views | Member views of the vendor profile across Proven marketplaces. Log scale, full marks at 10,000. Added once the data feed is live. | 15 |
| Member redemption clicks | Clicks by verified members on the vendor's offers. Log scale, full marks at 5,000. | 15 |
| Client quality | Clients the vendor names on its own website, case studies or press releases, weighted by caliber. Full marks at 4. | 20 |
| Operating tenure | Years since founding, from a public record. Full marks at 15 years. | 10 |
| Market standing | Publicly traded or owned by a public company 10. Private company valued $1B+ or established partnership 6. | 10 |
| Connected relationships | Client relationships confirmed by CRM sync or Crossbeam. Log scale, full marks at 500. | 10 |
| Connected data | Crossbeam connected 3, CRM syncing 2. | 5 |
Vendors cannot pay to change a score. Scores can't be bought. About the data.
Source: Proven platform data, public records and vendor websites. Vendors cannot pay to change a score. Scores can't be bought. Data updated 2026-10-27. About the data · Proven