The highest Proven Scores in Recruiting & ATS are Greenhouse Software (71/100, Established), Gem (67/100, Established) and LinkedIn (61/100, Established, Provisional score). They are ranked on the Proven Trust Index using Proven marketplaces, Member redemption clicks, Client quality, Operating tenure, Market standing, Connected relationships and Connected data. Inputs without data are left out and the score is scaled to 100. Vendors cannot pay to change a score.
| Rank | Name | Proven Score | Band | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greenhouse Software | 71 | Established | Stage: Series D · Team size: 850 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 2 | Gem | 67 | Established | Stage: Series C · Team size: 150 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 3 | 61 | Established. Provisional score | Team size: 23,000 employees · Region: Sunnyvale, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS | |
| 4 | Ashby | 53 | Established | Stage: Series D · Team size: 430 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 5 | Juicebox | 52 | Established | Stage: Series B · Team size: 120 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 6 | BrightHire | 52 | Established | Stage: Series B · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 7 | Workable | 51 | Established | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 460 employees · Region: Boston, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 8 | SingleSprout | 51 | Established | Team size: 33 employees · Region: Newport Beach, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 9 | Hunt Club | 49 | Emerging | Stage: Series B · Team size: 230 employees · Region: Chicago, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 10 | Talentpair | 49 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 16 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 11 | Checkr | 49 | Emerging | Stage: Series E · Team size: 1,900 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 12 | Findem | 47 | Emerging | Stage: Series C · Team size: 150 employees · Region: Redwood City, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 13 | Betts Recruiting | 47 | Emerging | Team size: 140 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 14 | Metaview | 47 | Emerging | Stage: Series C · Team size: 140 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 15 | Riviera Partners | 47 | Emerging | Stage: Private Equity · Team size: 340 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 16 | SwingSearch | 47 | Emerging | Team size: 55 employees · Region: Oakland, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 17 | RevelOne | 47 | Emerging | Team size: 34 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 18 | Codility | 46 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 100 employees · Region: United Kingdom · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 19 | Beacon Talent | 45 | Emerging | Team size: 62 employees · Region: Wilmington, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 20 | Acceler8 Talent | 45 | Emerging | Team size: 38 employees · Region: Boston, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 21 | PSG Global Solutions, Inc. | 44 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 4,300 employees · Region: Marina del Rey, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 22 | Fetcher | 44 | Emerging | Stage: Series B · Team size: 150 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 23 | Brightwater Recruitment | 44 | Emerging | Team size: 210 employees · Region: Dublin, Ireland · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 24 | CoderPad | 43 | Emerging | Stage: Venture (Round not Specified) · Team size: 95 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 25 | EER Global | 43 | Emerging | Team size: 430 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 26 | Lawrence Harvey | 43 | Emerging | Team size: 190 employees · Region: London, United Kingdom · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 27 | the rec hub. | 43 | Emerging | Team size: 73 employees · Region: United Kingdom · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 28 | hackajob | 42 | Emerging | Stage: Series B · Team size: 120 employees · Region: London, United Kingdom · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 29 | Kula | 41 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 48 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 30 | Erevena | 41 | Emerging | Team size: 77 employees · Region: London, United Kingdom · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 31 | Talentful | 41 | Emerging | Team size: 300 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 32 | Captivate Talent | 40 | Emerging | Team size: 21 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 33 | cord | 40 | Emerging | Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 34 | Executive People | 40 | Emerging | Team size: 5 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 35 | Quantum | 40 | Emerging | Team size: 77 employees · Region: Miami, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 36 | Rocket (Recruiting) | 40 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 31 employees · Region: Daly City, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 37 | Sherpa (previously Kandidate) | 39 | Emerging | Team size: 15 employees · Region: London, United Kingdom · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 38 | Underdog.io | 39 | Emerging | Team size: 52 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 39 | CFW Careers | 38 | Emerging | Team size: 7 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 40 | Integrity Power Search | 38 | Emerging | Team size: 36 employees · Region: South Burlington, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 41 | Criteria | 38 | Emerging | Stage: Private Equity · Team size: 180 employees · Region: Los Angeles, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 42 | Consider | 38 | Emerging | Stage: Debt Financing · Team size: 17 employees · Region: Redwood City, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 43 | Veremark | 37 | Emerging | Stage: Series B · Team size: 210 employees · Region: United Kingdom · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 44 | Viva | 36 | Emerging | Team size: 300 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 45 | Dover | 35 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 130 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 46 | Needl Search | 35 | Emerging | Team size: 10 employees · Region: Dublin, Ireland · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 47 | Crosschq | 34 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Region: Danville, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 48 | Storm4 | 34 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 55 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 49 | Talentium | 33 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 33 employees · Region: Stockholm, Sweden · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 50 | tofu | 33 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 18 employees · Region: Toronto, Canada · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 51 | Spectrum Search | 32 | Emerging | Team size: 11 employees · Region: London, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 52 | Jack and Jill | 32 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 200 employees · Region: London, United Kingdom · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 53 | Pyxis Search | 31 | Emerging | Team size: 3 employees · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 54 | Connectd | 24 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 680 employees · Region: London, United Kingdom · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 55 | Collins McNicholas | 24 | Emerging | Team size: 61 employees · Region: Dublin, Ireland · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 56 | Hireflow | 21 | Emerging | Team size: 1 employees · Region: Lisbon, Portugal · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 57 | Boon | 19 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 14 employees · Region: Culver City, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 58 | Moonhub | 19 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 7 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 59 | True Search | 19 | Emerging | Region: Haddonfield, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 60 | Screenify | 17 | Emerging | Team size: 3 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 61 | Heidrick & Struggles | 16 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 2,200 employees · Region: Chicago, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 62 | Zeren | 16 | Emerging | Team size: 33 employees · Region: London, United Kingdom · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 63 | Hyperjob | 14 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Region: Riga, Latvia · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 64 | Pod | 14 | Emerging | Team size: 4 employees · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 65 | Employ | 13 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 160 employees · Region: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 66 | THE ORG | 13 | Emerging | Stage: Other · Team size: 21 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 67 | Silveroak Capital Academy | 12 | Emerging | Team size: 5 employees · Region: United States · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 68 | Pale Blue Dot® Recruitment | 11 | Emerging | Team size: 4 employees · Region: Galway, Ireland · Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 69 | Levit8 AI | 8 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 70 | Glints | 7 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 71 | Drafted | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 72 | Eightfold | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 73 | GoodTime.io | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
| 74 | アカリク | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Recruiting & ATS |
Vendors in Recruiting & ATS are ordered by Proven Score. Data updated 2026-10-27. Inputs without data are left out and the score is scaled to 100. A score without client quality is marked Provisional score.
| Input | How it is measured | Max |
|---|---|---|
| Proven marketplaces | Investor, bank and government marketplaces on Proven that list the vendor. Log scale, full marks at 150. | 15 |
| Profile views | Member views of the vendor profile across Proven marketplaces. Log scale, full marks at 10,000. Added once the data feed is live. | 15 |
| Member redemption clicks | Clicks by verified members on the vendor's offers. Log scale, full marks at 5,000. | 15 |
| Client quality | Clients the vendor names on its own website, case studies or press releases, weighted by caliber. Full marks at 4. | 20 |
| Operating tenure | Years since founding, from a public record. Full marks at 15 years. | 10 |
| Market standing | Publicly traded or owned by a public company 10. Private company valued $1B+ or established partnership 6. | 10 |
| Connected relationships | Client relationships confirmed by CRM sync or Crossbeam. Log scale, full marks at 500. | 10 |
| Connected data | Crossbeam connected 3, CRM syncing 2. | 5 |
Vendors cannot pay to change a score. Scores can't be bought. About the data.
Source: Proven platform data, public records and vendor websites. Vendors cannot pay to change a score. Scores can't be bought. Data updated 2026-10-27. About the data · Proven