The highest Proven Scores in Software development agencies are MetaLab (59/100, Established), Mindbowser (53/100, Established) and EPAM Systems (52/100, Established). They are ranked on the Proven Trust Index using Proven marketplaces, Member redemption clicks, Client quality, Operating tenure, Market standing, Connected relationships and Connected data. Inputs without data are left out and the score is scaled to 100. Vendors cannot pay to change a score.
| Rank | Name | Proven Score | Band | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MetaLab | 59 | Established | Team size: 160 employees · Region: Victoria, Canada · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 2 | Mindbowser | 53 | Established | Team size: 230 employees · Region: Jersey City, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 3 | EPAM Systems | 52 | Established | Team size: 63,000 employees · Region: Newtown, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 4 | Wunderdogs | 51 | Established | Team size: 21 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 5 | GlobalLogic | 51 | Established | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 68,000 employees · Region: Santa Clara, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 6 | QualityLogic | 50 | Established | Team size: 200 employees · Region: Boise, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 7 | TurnKey Tech Staffing | 47 | Emerging | Team size: 68 employees · Region: West Menlo Park, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 8 | BairesDev | 46 | Emerging | Team size: 3,200 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 9 | Microfeller | 45 | Emerging | Team size: 5 employees · Region: Ljubljana, Slovenia · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 10 | KMS Technology | 44 | Emerging | Stage: Private Equity · Team size: 1,700 employees · Region: Atlanta, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 11 | ITRex Group | 43 | Emerging | Team size: 250 employees · Region: Aliso Viejo, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 12 | Stride | 40 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 59 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 13 | Fluxon | 39 | Emerging | Team size: 300 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 14 | Sudolabs | 37 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 69 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 15 | Remedy Product Studio | 36 | Emerging | Team size: 69 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 16 | Caylent | 32 | Emerging | Stage: Venture (Round not Specified) · Team size: 950 employees · Region: Irvine, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 17 | SoftServe | 31 | Emerging | Team size: 11,000 employees · Region: Austin, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 18 | Pretty Great Studio | 24 | Emerging | Team size: 4 employees · Region: West Hollywood, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 19 | Number8 | 22 | Emerging | Use case: Software development agencies |
| 20 | Grupa | 22 | Emerging | Stage: Angel · Team size: 8 employees · Region: San Jose, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 21 | 7code | 21 | Emerging. Provisional score | Team size: 22 employees · Region: Cluj-Napoca, Romania · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 22 | Civic Technologies | 18 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 20 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Software development agencies |
| 23 | Buildas | 9 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Software development agencies |
| 24 | EMURGO | 8 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Software development agencies |
| 25 | Netfork LLC | 8 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Software development agencies |
| 26 | CoMedia | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Software development agencies |
| 27 | Ideas2IT | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Software development agencies |
| 28 | UNIFY TECHNOLOGIES | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Software development agencies |
Vendors in Software development agencies are ordered by Proven Score. Data updated 2026-10-27. Inputs without data are left out and the score is scaled to 100. A score without client quality is marked Provisional score.
| Input | How it is measured | Max |
|---|---|---|
| Proven marketplaces | Investor, bank and government marketplaces on Proven that list the vendor. Log scale, full marks at 150. | 15 |
| Profile views | Member views of the vendor profile across Proven marketplaces. Log scale, full marks at 10,000. Added once the data feed is live. | 15 |
| Member redemption clicks | Clicks by verified members on the vendor's offers. Log scale, full marks at 5,000. | 15 |
| Client quality | Clients the vendor names on its own website, case studies or press releases, weighted by caliber. Full marks at 4. | 20 |
| Operating tenure | Years since founding, from a public record. Full marks at 15 years. | 10 |
| Market standing | Publicly traded or owned by a public company 10. Private company valued $1B+ or established partnership 6. | 10 |
| Connected relationships | Client relationships confirmed by CRM sync or Crossbeam. Log scale, full marks at 500. | 10 |
| Connected data | Crossbeam connected 3, CRM syncing 2. | 5 |
Vendors cannot pay to change a score. Scores can't be bought. About the data.
Source: Proven platform data, public records and vendor websites. Vendors cannot pay to change a score. Scores can't be bought. Data updated 2026-10-27. About the data · Proven