The highest Proven Scores in Cybersecurity are Wiz (65/100, Established), CrowdStrike (54/100, Established) and Trail of Bits (49/100, Emerging). They are ranked on the Proven Trust Index using Proven marketplaces, Member redemption clicks, Client quality, Operating tenure, Market standing, Connected relationships and Connected data. Inputs without data are left out and the score is scaled to 100. Vendors cannot pay to change a score.
| Rank | Name | Proven Score | Band | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wiz | 65 | Established | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 1,800 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 2 | CrowdStrike | 54 | Established | Team size: 12,000 employees · Region: Sunnyvale, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 3 | Trail of Bits | 49 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 150 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 4 | Tines | 48 | Emerging | Stage: Series C · Team size: 630 employees · Region: Dublin, Ireland · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 5 | BeyondTrust | 48 | Emerging | Stage: Private Equity · Team size: 1,600 employees · Region: Duluth, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 6 | Black Duck | 47 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 1,400 employees · Region: Burlington, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 7 | Clearwater | 45 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 430 employees · Region: Nashville, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 8 | Orca Security | 44 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 400 employees · Region: Portland, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 9 | Cato Networks | 43 | Emerging | Stage: Series G · Team size: 1,500 employees · Region: Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 10 | Socket | 42 | Emerging | Stage: Series C · Team size: 120 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 11 | Very Good Security (VGS) | 41 | Emerging | Stage: Series C · Team size: 1 employees · Region: San Francisco, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 12 | Zokyo | 41 | Emerging | Team size: 19 employees · Region: Barcelona, Spain · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 13 | Sigma Prime | 40 | Emerging | Team size: 43 employees · Region: Haymarket, Australia · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 14 | Olympix | 37 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 14 employees · Region: New York, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 15 | SenseOn | 37 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 40 employees · Region: London, United Kingdom · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 16 | Pangea | 36 | Emerging | Stage: Merger / Acquisition · Team size: 26 employees · Region: Palo Alto, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 17 | Halborn | 36 | Emerging | Stage: Series A · Team size: 73 employees · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 18 | Zellic | 36 | Emerging | Team size: 50 employees · Region: Missouri City, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 19 | Hexens | 35 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 36 employees · Region: British Virgin Islands · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 20 | Hypernative | 34 | Emerging | Stage: Series B · Team size: 110 employees · Region: Herzliya, Israel · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 21 | Secure Cloud Innovations | 25 | Emerging | Team size: 9 employees · Region: Chesapeake, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 22 | Octane Security | 15 | Emerging | Stage: Seed · Team size: 15 employees · Region: Bengaluru, India · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 23 | AppSecAI | 13 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 24 | Drawbridge | 10 | Emerging | Stage: Venture (Round not Specified) · Team size: 120 employees · Region: Palm Beach Gardens, United States · Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 25 | Tailscale | 6 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 26 | Abnormal Security | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 27 | Arcjet | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 28 | ASTRA Security | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 29 | Checkmarx | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 30 | CYE | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 31 | KnowBe4 | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 32 | Qualys | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 33 | RISCPoint | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 34 | StackRox, Inc. | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
| 35 | Tantalum Security | 5 | Emerging. Provisional score | Use case: Cybersecurity |
Vendors in Cybersecurity are ordered by Proven Score. Data updated 2026-10-27. Inputs without data are left out and the score is scaled to 100. A score without client quality is marked Provisional score.
| Input | How it is measured | Max |
|---|---|---|
| Proven marketplaces | Investor, bank and government marketplaces on Proven that list the vendor. Log scale, full marks at 150. | 15 |
| Profile views | Member views of the vendor profile across Proven marketplaces. Log scale, full marks at 10,000. Added once the data feed is live. | 15 |
| Member redemption clicks | Clicks by verified members on the vendor's offers. Log scale, full marks at 5,000. | 15 |
| Client quality | Clients the vendor names on its own website, case studies or press releases, weighted by caliber. Full marks at 4. | 20 |
| Operating tenure | Years since founding, from a public record. Full marks at 15 years. | 10 |
| Market standing | Publicly traded or owned by a public company 10. Private company valued $1B+ or established partnership 6. | 10 |
| Connected relationships | Client relationships confirmed by CRM sync or Crossbeam. Log scale, full marks at 500. | 10 |
| Connected data | Crossbeam connected 3, CRM syncing 2. | 5 |
Vendors cannot pay to change a score. Scores can't be bought. About the data.
Source: Proven platform data, public records and vendor websites. Vendors cannot pay to change a score. Scores can't be bought. Data updated 2026-10-27. About the data · Proven